Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Small Group Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kivlighan, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Mullison, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Participants' Perception of Therapeutic Factors in Group Counseling

The Role of Interpersonal Style and Stage of Group Development

Dennis M. Kivlighan, JR

University of Missouri-Columbia

Donald Mullison

University of Maryland-College Park

Yalom (1985) hypothesizes that clients'perception of therapeutic factors depend on the stage of group development and on client individual difference variables. The hypotheses were tested using the critical incident reports obtained from 18 participants in three 11-session counseling groups. Judges classified the critical incident reports into therapeutic factor cat egories. Perceptions of the relative importance of these factors were analyzed by stage of group development (early versus late) and by client interpersonal orientation (affiliative versus nonaffiliative and dominant versus submissive). Results indicate differences in the relative importance of the therapeutic factors as seen by the group participants for stage of group development and for participants' affiliativeness. No differences were found for dom inant versus submissive clients. The results are discussed in relation to theories of group de velopment, clinical group practice, and interpersonal conceptualization of counseling and therapy.

Small Group Research, Vol. 19, No. 4, 452-468 (1988)
DOI: 10.1177/104649648801900403


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?