This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Valacich, J. S. Articles by Nunamaker, J. F. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Group Size and Anonymity Effects on Computer-Mediated Idea Generation

Indiana University

Alan R. Dennis

University of Georgia

J. F. Nunamaker, Jr.

University of Arizona

Some for,ns of computer-mediated communication enable groups to engage simultaneously in multiple electronic conversations. One interesting aspect of this technology, in addition to this parallelism, is that the channel is configurable to support forms of group interaction that were previously difficult, if not impossible. This article reports a laboratory experiment that examined the effects of group size (3 and 9 members) and group member anonymity on the performance of groups using a computer-mediated idea-generation system. Although group members in all conditions made, on average, the same number of comments, larger groups generated significantly more ideas (and higher-quality ideas as rated by judges) than did smaller groups. Anzonymity had no effect on ideational performance. Members of small-idenitified groups made the fewest critical remarks, were the most satisfied, and rated themselves more effective than group members from the other experimental conditions.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N. C. Romano Jr., P. B. Lowry, and T. L. Roberts Technology-Supported Small Group Interaction: Extending a Tradition of Leading Research for Virtual Teams and Global Organizations Small Group Research, February 1, 2007; 38(1): 3 - 11. [PDF]

				S. A. Rains The Impact of Anonymity on Perceptions of Source Credibility and Influence in Computer-Mediated Group Communication: A Test of Two Competing Hypotheses Communication Research, February 1, 2007; 34(1): 100 - 125. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. J. Mejias The Interaction of Process Losses, Process Gains, and Meeting Satisfaction Within Technology-Supported Environments Small Group Research, February 1, 2007; 38(1): 156 - 194. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. B. Lowry, T. L. Roberts, N. C. Romano Jr., P. D. Cheney, and R. T. Hightower The Impact of Group Size and Social Presence on Small-Group Communication: Does Computer-Mediated Communication Make a Difference? Small Group Research, December 1, 2006; 37(6): 631 - 661. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. L. Martins, L. L. Gilson, and M. T. Maynard Virtual Teams: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go From Here? Journal of Management, December 1, 2004; 30(6): 805 - 835. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. S. Kahai, J. J. Sosik, and B. J. Avolio Effects of Participative and Directive Leadership in Electronic Groups Group Organization Management, February 1, 2004; 29(1): 67 - 105. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. P. Hare Roles, Relationships, And Groups In Organizations: Some Conclusions And Recommendations Small Group Research, April 1, 2003; 34(2): 123 - 154. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. E. Sawyer, D. L. Ferry, and C. Kydd Learning about and from Group Support Systems Journal of Management Education, June 1, 2001; 25(3): 352 - 371. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Ziegler, M. Diehl, and G. Zijlstra Idea Production in Nominal and Virtual Groups: Does Computer-Mediated Communication Improve Group Brainstorming? Group Processes Intergroup Relations, April 1, 2000; 3(2): 141 - 158. [Abstract] [PDF]

				W. H. Cooper, R. B. Gallupe, S. Pollard, and J. Cadsby Some Liberating Effects of Anonymous Electronic Brainstorming Small Group Research, April 1, 1998; 29(2): 147 - 178. [Abstract]

				J. J. Sosik Effects of Transformational Leadership and Anonymity on Idea Generation in Computer-Mediated Groups Group Organization Management, December 1, 1997; 22(4): 460 - 487. [Abstract]

				C. A.P. Smith and S. C. Hayne Decision Making under Time Pressure: An Investigation of Decision Speed and Decision Quality of Computer-Supported Groups Management Communication Quarterly, August 1, 1997; 11(1): 97 - 126. [Abstract]

				M. W. Kramer, C. L. Kuo, and J. C. Dailey The Impact of Brainstorming Techniques on Subsequent Group Processes: Beyond Generating Ideas Small Group Research, May 1, 1997; 28(2): 218 - 242. [Abstract]

				M. C. Roy, S. Gauvin, and M. Limayem Electronic Group Brainstorming: The Role of Feedback on Productivity Small Group Research, May 1, 1996; 27(2): 215 - 247. [Abstract]

				J. B. WALTHER Computer-Mediated Communication: Impersonal, Interpersonal, and Hyperpersonal Interaction Communication Research, February 1, 1996; 23(1): 3 - 43. [Abstract]

				V. Brown and P. B. Paulus A Simple Dynamic Model of Social Factors in Group Brainstorming Small Group Research, February 1, 1996; 27(1): 91 - 114. [Abstract]

				M. Adkins and D. E. Brashers The Power of Language in Computer-Mediated Groups Management Communication Quarterly, February 1, 1995; 8(3): 289 - 322. [Abstract]

				A. R. Dennis and J. S. Valacich Group, Sub-Group, and Nominal Group Idea Generation: New Rules for a New Media? Journal of Management, August 1, 1994; 20(4): 723 - 736. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. N. Scudder, R. T. Herschel, and M. D. Crossland Test of a Model Linking Cognitive Motivation, Assessment of Alternatives, Decision Quality, and Group Process Satisfaction Small Group Research, February 1, 1994; 25(1): 57 - 82. [Abstract]