Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Small Group Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baker, P. M.
Right arrow Articles by Eaton, G. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Seniority Versus Age as Causes of Dominance in Social Groups

Macaques and Men

Paul M. Baker

University of Victoria

G. Gray Eaton

Oregon Regional Primate Research Center

Seniority systems are fundamental organizing mechanisms of most social groups, but seniority is often confounded with chronological age. An analysis of male dominance orders in troops of Japanese and rhesus macaques showed that seniority within the macaque troops was clearly more predictive of dominance than was mere chronological age. Some quasiexperimental datafrom a sample of humans also revealed that seniority was more important than chronological age in determining employee layoff rankings. The Japanese macaque data camefrom Norikoshi and Koyama 's study of two wild butprovisionedtroops ofmonkeys, each containing 26adult males. The multiple regression of dominance rank on seniority and age produced standardized multiple regression coefficients of .65 and .35 for one troop, whereas thefiguresfor the other troop were .82 and .41, respectively. A secondary analysis of Hill's rhesus macaque data showed that seniority had a standardized multiple regression coefficient of .66, but the coerficientforage was only .16, supporting the Japanese macaque data. Finally, new data from a sample of humans showed a similar pattern When subjects were asked to establish a layoff ranking of hypothetical employees described by seniority and age, their rankings were determined primarily by seniority: The coefficients were. 75 and.10, respectively.

Small Group Research, Vol. 23, No. 3, 322-343 (1992)
DOI: 10.1177/1046496492233004
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Small Group ResearchHome page
R. A. Rodriguez
Challenging Demographic Reductionism: A Pilot Study Investigating Diversity in Group Composition
Small Group Research, December 1, 1998; 29(6): 744 - 759.
[Abstract]