Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Small Group Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kirchmeyer, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Multicultural Task Groups

An Account of the Low Contribution Level of Minorities

Catherine Kirchmeyer

Wayne State University

This study sought to explain the contribution imbalance between minority and majority members of multicultural task groups in terms of differences in personal characteristics outside of racial or ethnic identity. Business students who volunteered to participate in a decision-making exercise were assigned to four-person groups on the bases of sex and minority status. A total of 41 multicultural groups were formed. Aftenvard, participants individually completed questionnaires on the experience and their personal characteristics. Low comnmnunication competetce, low inasculinity, and highfemininity were associated both with minority status and with low contribution to decision making. As a block the personal variables explained more variance in contribution to decision making than did minority status alone. In addition, high contributing minorities appeared to be motivated by needs unlike those of high contributing nonminorities. The implications of these findings for facilitators of multicultural groups are discussed.

Small Group Research, Vol. 24, No. 1, 127-148 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/1046496493241009


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Small Group ResearchHome page
M. A. Valenti and T. Rockett
The Effects of Demographic Differences on Forming Intragroup Relationships
Small Group Research, April 1, 2008; 39(2): 179 - 202.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Adolescent ResearchHome page
P. Vedder
Language, Ethnic Identity, and the Adaptation of Immigrant Youth in the Netherlands
Journal of Adolescent Research, May 1, 2005; 20(3): 396 - 416.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Group Organization ManagementHome page
E. V. Hobman, P. Bordia, and C. Gallois
Perceived Dissimilarity and Work Group Involvement: The Moderating Effects of Group Openness to Diversity
Group Organization Management, October 1, 2004; 29(5): 560 - 587.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Simulation GamingHome page
D. R. Bacon, K. A. Stewart, and E. S. Anderson
Methods of Assigning Players to Teams: A Review and Novel Approach
Simulation Gaming, March 1, 2001; 32(1): 6 - 17.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Group Organization ManagementHome page
L. Karakowsky and K. McBey
Do My Contributions Matter? The Influence of Imputed Expertise on Member Involvement and Self-Evaluations in the Work Group
Group Organization Management, March 1, 2001; 26(1): 70 - 92.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Culture PsychologyHome page
C. Vallaster
Conducting Field Research in Asia: Fundamental Differences As Compared to Western Societies
Culture Psychology, December 1, 2000; 6(4): 461 - 476.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Small Group ResearchHome page
V. E. Barker, J. R. Abrams, V. Tiyaamornwong, D. R. Seibold, A. Duggan, H. S. Park, and M. Sebastian
New Contexts for Relational Communication in Groups
Small Group Research, August 1, 2000; 31(4): 470 - 503.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Small Group ResearchHome page
J. Li, L. Karakowsky, and J. P. Siegel
The Effects of Proportional Representation on Intragroup Behavior in Mixed-Race Decision-Making Groups
Small Group Research, June 1, 1999; 30(3): 259 - 279.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Small Group ResearchHome page
L. M. Millhous
The Experience of Culture in Multicultural Groups: Case Studies of Russian-American Collaboration in Business
Small Group Research, June 1, 1999; 30(3): 280 - 308.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Small Group ResearchHome page
R. A. Rodriguez
Challenging Demographic Reductionism: A Pilot Study Investigating Diversity in Group Composition
Small Group Research, December 1, 1998; 29(6): 744 - 759.
[Abstract]


Home page
Journal of Marketing EducationHome page
D. R. Bacon, K. A. Stewart, and S. Stewart-Belle
Exploring Predictors of Student Team Project Performance
Journal of Marketing Education, April 1, 1998; 20(1): 63 - 71.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
T. Vacha-Haase
Reliability Generalization: Exploring Variance in Measurement Error Affecting Score Reliability Across Studies
Educational and Psychological Measurement, February 1, 1998; 58(1): 6 - 20.
[Abstract]


Home page
Small Group ResearchHome page
B. J. Broome and L. Fulbright
A Multistage Influence Model of Barriers to Group Problem Solving: A Participant-Generated Agenda for Small Group Research
Small Group Research, February 1, 1995; 26(1): 25 - 55.
[Abstract]