|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Identifying Obstacles to Small Group Democracy
John Gastil
University of Wisconsin-Madison
This pair of studies examines some of the obstacles groups encounter in their attempts to practice small group democracy. Through a critical case study, a number of problems are identified, including excessive meeting length, unequal involvement in the group, unequal commitment to group goals, cliques and "miniconsensus," differences in communication skills and styles, anid protracted interpersonal conflicts. The second study tests the external validity of thefirst study'sfindings, suggesting that these obstacles may, indeed4 be common and formidable barriers to small group democracy.
Small Group Research, Vol. 24, No. 1,
5-27 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/1046496493241002

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Ferber, F. Foltz, and R. Pugliese
Cyberdemocracy and Online Politics: A New Model of Interactivity
Bulletin of Science Technology Society,
October 1, 2007;
27(5):
391 - 400.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. W. Kramer, C. L. Kuo, and J. C. Dailey
The Impact of Brainstorming Techniques on Subsequent Group Processes: Beyond Generating Ideas
Small Group Research,
May 1, 1997;
28(2):
218 - 242.
[Abstract]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. J. Broome and L. Fulbright
A Multistage Influence Model of Barriers to Group Problem Solving: A Participant-Generated Agenda for Small Group Research
Small Group Research,
February 1, 1995;
26(1):
25 - 55.
[Abstract]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. R. Frey
The Naturalistic Paradigm: Studying Small Groups in the Postmodern Era
Small Group Research,
November 1, 1994;
25(4):
551 - 577.
[Abstract]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Gastil
A Definition and Illustration of Democratic Leadership
Human Relations,
August 1, 1994;
47(8):
953 - 975.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|