Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Small Group Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wheelan, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Mckeage, R. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Developmental Patterns in Small and Large Groups

Susan A. Wheelan

Temple University

Robert L. Mckeage

University of Scranton

This study investigated developmental patterns in small and large groups. The research asked whether there were proportional differences in the kinds of verbal statements made in these group types and whether these proportions changed over time. A repeated measures analysis of variance revealed both similarities and differences between the group types. Of the seven investigated categories of verbal statements, the proportions and sequencing of Dependent, Counterdependent, and Counterpersonal statements were similar in both group types. The sequencing of Pairing and Fight statements was also similar The small groups generated significantly more Pairing, Flight, and Work statements and less Fight statements. The developmental sequence in both group types was more similar than different. However, participation, Pairing, and Work were significantly lower in the large groups and Fight was significantly higher The study concluded that increased group size does not radically alter development but does appear to negatively affect participation, cohesion, and productivity.

Small Group Research, Vol. 24, No. 1, 60-83 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/1046496493241005


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Small Group ResearchHome page
S. A. Wheelan
Group Size, Group Development, and Group Productivity
Small Group Research, April 1, 2009; 40(2): 247 - 262.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Applied Behavioral ScienceHome page
M. J. Fambrough and S. A. Comerford
The Changing Epistemological Assumptions of Group Theory
Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, September 1, 2006; 42(3): 330 - 349.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Small Group ResearchHome page
S. A. Wheelan and T. Williams
Mapping Dynamic Interaction Patterns in Work Groups
Small Group Research, August 1, 2003; 34(4): 443 - 467.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Small Group ResearchHome page
S. A. Wheelan, B. Davidson, and F. Tilin
Group Development Across Time: Reality or Illusion?
Small Group Research, April 1, 2003; 34(2): 223 - 245.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Small Group ResearchHome page
S. A. Wheelan and A. R. Lisk
Cohort Group Effectiveness and the Educational Achievement of Adult Undergraduate Students
Small Group Research, December 1, 2000; 31(6): 724 - 738.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Small Group ResearchHome page
P. Bordia, N. Difonzo, and A. Chang
Rumor as Group Problem Solving: Development Patterns in Informal Computer-Mediated Groups
Small Group Research, February 1, 1999; 30(1): 8 - 28.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Small Group ResearchHome page
C. A. Vanlear and E. A. Mabry
Testing Contrasting Interaction Models for Discriminating between Consensual and Dissentient Decision-Making Groups
Small Group Research, February 1, 1999; 30(1): 29 - 58.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Small Group ResearchHome page
G. Buzaglo and S. A. Wheelan
Facilitating Work Team Effectiveness: Case Studies from Central America
Small Group Research, February 1, 1999; 30(1): 108 - 129.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Small Group ResearchHome page
S. A. Wheelan and R. M. Kaeser
The Influence of Task Type and Designated Leaders on Developmental Patterns in Groups
Small Group Research, February 1, 1997; 28(1): 94 - 121.
[Abstract]


Home page
Small Group ResearchHome page
S. A. Wheelan and F. Johnston
The Role of Informal Member Leaders in a System Containing Formal Leaders
Small Group Research, February 1, 1996; 27(1): 33 - 55.
[Abstract]


Home page
Small Group ResearchHome page
S. A. Wheelan and J. M. Hochberger
Validation Studies of the Group Development Questionnaire
Small Group Research, February 1, 1996; 27(1): 143 - 170.
[Abstract]


Home page
Group Organization ManagementHome page
S. A. Wheelan and C. L. Krasick
The Emergence, Transmission, and Acceptance of Themes in a Temporary System of Interacting Groups
Group Organization Management, June 1, 1993; 18(2): 237 - 260.
[Abstract]