Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Small Group Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gruenfeld, D. H
Right arrow Articles by Hollingshead, A. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Sociocognition in Work Groups

The Evolution of Group Integrative Complexity and Its Relation to Task Performance

Deborah H Gruenfeld

Andrea B. Hollingshead

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

The study described in this article examined the integrative complexity of shared conceptualizations of group culture: how they can be distinguished from member cognitions about group culture and how they affect taskperformance over time. Twenty-two workgroups wrote weekly essays about their collective activity over a 12-week period. Group members first wrote independent accounts and then collaborated to create a single group account of their activity during that week During thefirst 5 weeks of that period, the integrative complexity of group essays was not significantly differentfrom that of average individual essays but was significantly lower than that of essays written by the highest complexity members. During the last 5 weeks, the level of group complexity increased at a greater rate than either the average orhighest individual levels, until it was significantly greater than that of the average individual and statistically equivalent to that of the highest member The results also supported the notion that the relation of integrative complexity-at the group level-to the quality of decision outcomes depends on the nature of the task Taken as a whole, these findings support the developing notion that thoughts and ideas can be conceived as collective, rather than purely individual, phenomena.

Small Group Research, Vol. 24, No. 3, 383-405 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/1046496493243006


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Management LearningHome page
O. Branzei and C. Fredette
Effects of Newcomer Practicing on Cross-level Learning Distortions
Management Learning, September 1, 2008; 39(4): 393 - 412.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of ManagementHome page
R. Rico, E. Molleman, M. Sanchez-Manzanares, and G. S. Van der Vegt
The Effects of Diversity Faultlines and Team Task Autonomy on Decision Quality and Social Integration
Journal of Management, February 1, 2007; 33(1): 111 - 132.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Small Group ResearchHome page
D. C. Kayes
From Climbing Stairs to Riding Waves: Group Critical Thinking and Its Development
Small Group Research, December 1, 2006; 37(6): 612 - 630.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of the Academy of Marketing ScienceHome page
D. R. Deeter-Schmelz and R. P. Ramsey
An Investigation of Team Information Processing in Service Teams: Exploring the Link between Teams and Customers
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, October 1, 2003; 31(4): 409 - 424.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of ManagementHome page
Y. Gong
Toward a Dynamic Process Model of Staffing Composition and Subsidiary Outcomes in Multinational Enterprises
Journal of Management, April 1, 2003; 29(2): 259 - 280.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Group Processes Intergroup RelationsHome page
A. Bangerter
Maintaining Interpersonal Continuity in Groups: The Role of Collective Memory Processes in Redistributing Information
Group Processes Intergroup Relations, July 1, 2002; 5(3): 203 - 219.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Management EducationHome page
Y. Yoo, P. Kanawattanachai, and A. Citurs
Forging into the Wired Wilderness: A Case Study of a Technology-Mediated Distributed Discussion-Based Class
Journal of Management Education, April 1, 2002; 26(2): 139 - 163.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Adult Education QuarterlyHome page
D. W. Kilgore
A Group Learning Intervention into How Women Learn Empathy in Prison
Adult Education Quarterly, February 1, 2001; 51(2): 146 - 164.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Group Processes Intergroup RelationsHome page
E. Peterson, T. R. Mitchell, L. Thompson, and R. Burr
Collective Efficacy and Aspects of Shared Mental Models as Predictors of Performance Over Time in Work Groups
Group Processes Intergroup Relations, July 1, 2000; 3(3): 296 - 316.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Group Processes Intergroup RelationsHome page
F. Brodbeck and T. Greitemeyer
A Dynamic Model of Group Performance: Considering the Group Members' Capacity to Learn
Group Processes Intergroup Relations, April 1, 2000; 3(2): 159 - 182.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
L. Thompson and G. A. Fine
Socially Shared Cognition, Affect, and Behavior: A Review and Integration
Personality and Social Psychology Review, November 1, 1999; 3(4): 278 - 302.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
S. Lembke and M. G. Wilson
Putting the "Team" into Teamwork: Alternative Theoretical Contributions for Contemporary Management Practice
Human Relations, July 1, 1998; 51(7): 927 - 944.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of ManagementHome page
R. Klimoski and S. Mohammed
Team Mental Model: Construct or Metaphor?
Journal of Management, April 1, 1994; 20(2): 403 - 437.
[Abstract] [PDF]