|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Small Group Research, Vol. 25, No. 2,
205-223 (1994)
DOI: 10.1177/1046496494252004
You Can Go Home Again
Returning Group Research to the Group Context with an Eye on Developmental Issues
Stephen Worchel
Texas A&M University
Much of the research on group behavior, especially that involving social cognition, has been conducted outside the group setting and devoid of social interaction. Some of the reasons for this include the view that group factors (especially developmentalfactors) are unimportant, the difficulty of conducting group-based research, and the lack of compatible group theories to guide the research. This is an unfortunate oversight because the practice fails to include many group variables that are important to the behaviors under study, and the research fails to contribute to our understanding of group dynamics. One of the variables overlooked when research is removedfrom the group setting is influence of group development. A model of group development is presented suggesting that development occurs through the cyclical stages of Discontent, Precipitating Incident, Identification, Group Productivity, Individuation, and Decay. The model offers specific hypotheses abouta host of social behaviors and cognitions. Some of these predictions are identified, and a research program testing these predictions is briefly reviewed. It is argued that these developmentalfactors are important for understanding and predicting group behaviors and cognitions about groups. Methodology for conducting group research is discussed, and a call for more descriptive research is made. Overall, it is argued that the most productive approach to studying groups is a balanced one that includes efforts to examine behaviors both within and outside the group setting, and uses both analytical methodologies as well as descriptive methods.
 CiteULike  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
A. Chang, J. Duck, and P. Bordia
Understanding the Multidimensionality of Group Development
Small Group Research,
August 1, 2006;
37(4):
327 - 350.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. E. McMorris, N. H. Gottlieb, and G. G. Sneden
Developmental Stages in Public Health Partnerships: A Practical Perspective
Health Promot Pract,
April 1, 2005;
6(2):
219 - 226.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Arrow, M. S. Poole, K. B. Henry, S. Wheelan, and R. Moreland
Time, Change, and Development: The Temporal Perspective on Groups
Small Group Research,
February 1, 2004;
35(1):
73 - 105.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. L. Riddle, C. M. Anderson, and M. M. Martin
Small Group Socialization Scale: Development and Validity
Small Group Research,
October 1, 2000;
31(5):
554 - 572.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. E. McGrath, H. Arrow, and J. L. Berdahl
The Study of Groups: Past, Present, and Future
Personality and Social Psychology Review,
February 1, 2000;
4(1):
95 - 105.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Thompson and G. A. Fine
Socially Shared Cognition, Affect, and Behavior: A Review and Integration
Personality and Social Psychology Review,
November 1, 1999;
3(4):
278 - 302.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. B. Henry, H. Arrow, and B. Carini
A Tripartite Model of Group Identification: Theory and Measurement
Small Group Research,
October 1, 1999;
30(5):
558 - 581.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. G. Cohen and D. E. Bailey
What Makes Teams Work: Group Effectiveness Research from the Shop Floor to the Executive Suite
Journal of Management,
June 1, 1997;
23(3):
239 - 290.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
V. Wekselberg, W. C. Goggin, and T. J. Collings
A Multifaceted Concept of Group Maturity and Its Measurement and Relationship to Group Performance
Small Group Research,
February 1, 1997;
28(1):
3 - 28.
[Abstract]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. L. Nye
Discussion: The Social Perceiver as a Social Being
Small Group Research,
May 1, 1994;
25(2):
316 - 322.
|
|
|
|
