Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Small Group Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hoyle, R. H.
Right arrow Articles by Crawford, A. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Use of Individual-Level Data to Investigate Group Phenomena Issues and Strategies

Rick H. Hoyle

Anne M. Crawford

University of Kentucky

Researchers who investigate group phenomena can choose either the group as a whole or individuals within groups as a basis for formulating research questions, developing datagathering strategies, and conducting statistical analyses. This article considers the virtues and limitations of using individual-level data to investigate group phenomena and describes three categories of research questions about individuals in groups: (a) the contribution of group members to the composition of the group, (b) individuals'experience of belonging to the group, and (c) the impact of group membership on group members' personal life. The authors describe two examples from research on cohesion that addresses questions about individuals 'experience of belonging to groups and the impact of group membership on their personal life. We conclude by noting the limitations of the approach we advocate and mapping directions for future research suggested by our emphasis on individual-level analysis of small-group phenomena.

Small Group Research, Vol. 25, No. 4, 464-485 (1994)
DOI: 10.1177/1046496494254003


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Small Group ResearchHome page
V. Schei and J. K. Rognes
Small Group Negotiation: When Members Differ in Motivational Orientation
Small Group Research, June 1, 2005; 36(3): 289 - 320.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Small Group ResearchHome page
S. A. Wheelan, B. Davidson, and F. Tilin
Group Development Across Time: Reality or Illusion?
Small Group Research, April 1, 2003; 34(2): 223 - 245.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Small Group ResearchHome page
S. A. Carless
Reply to Carron and Brawley
Small Group Research, February 1, 2000; 31(1): 107 - 118.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Small Group ResearchHome page
W. W. Chin, Wm. D. Salisbury, A. W. Pearson, and M. J. Stollak
Perceived Cohesion in Small Groups: Adapting and Testing the Perceived Cohesion Scale in a Small-Group Setting
Small Group Research, December 1, 1999; 30(6): 751 - 766.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Small Group ResearchHome page
B. A. Wech, K. W. Mossholder, R. P. Steel, and N. Bennett
Does Work Group Cohesiveness Affect Individuals' Performance and Organizational Commitment?: A Cross-Level Examination
Small Group Research, August 1, 1998; 29(4): 472 - 494.
[Abstract]


Home page
Small Group ResearchHome page
M. H. Bond and W. Y.-F. Shiu
The Relationship between a Group's Personality Resources and the Two Dimensions of Its Group Process
Small Group Research, May 1, 1997; 28(2): 194 - 217.
[Abstract]