Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Small Group Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Frey, L. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Naturalistic Paradigm

Studying Small Groups in the Postmodern Era

Lawrence R. Frey

Loyola University Chicago

This article advocates the need to balance group research by rejecting the dominant paradigm that drives research-positivism--and adopting an alternative paradigm-the naturalistic paradigm. After critiquing positivistic group research, the philosophical assumptions and methodological practices of the naturalistic paradigm as they apply to small group research-the research setting, type of natural group, research foci, methodological procedures, and researchers' relationship with members of natural groups-are described. The author 's research program on creating and sustaining community in an AIDS residential facility is used to illustrate the conduct of naturalistic group research and the rich insights that can be obtained about group process. The article concludes that the naturalistic paradigm and its practices potentially can infuse group research with a renewed sense of purpose and urgency.

Small Group Research, Vol. 25, No. 4, 551-577 (1994)
DOI: 10.1177/1046496494254008
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Small Group ResearchHome page
L. R. Frey
The Symbolic-Interpretive Perspective on Group Dynamics
Small Group Research, June 1, 2004; 35(3): 277 - 306.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Small Group ResearchHome page
V. E. Barker, J. R. Abrams, V. Tiyaamornwong, D. R. Seibold, A. Duggan, H. S. Park, and M. Sebastian
New Contexts for Relational Communication in Groups
Small Group Research, August 1, 2000; 31(4): 470 - 503.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Small Group ResearchHome page
L. R. Hare and K. O'Neill
Effectiveness and Efficiency in Small Academic Peer Groups: A Case Study
Small Group Research, February 1, 2000; 31(1): 24 - 53.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 J Health PsycholHome page
L. R. Frey, M. B. Adelman, and J. L. Query JR.
Communication Practices in the Social Construction of Health in an AIDS Kesidence
J Health Psychol, July 1, 1996; 1(3): 383 - 397.
[Abstract]