Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Small Group Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Oostrum, J. V.
Right arrow Articles by Rabbie, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Intergroup Competition and Cooperation within Autocratic and Democratic Management Regimes

Jos Van Oostrum

Jacob M. Rabbie

Utrecht University

Since the classic leadership studies of Lewin, there has been an effort to identify the contingency variables that may moderate the effects of participation in decision making (PDM) on task satisfaction and performance. In this study, the effects of democratic and autocratic management regimes were examined in laboratory organizations in which groups or departments had either cooperative or competitive orientations toward each other This allows the examination of possible moderating effects of intergroup competition and cooperation on tasksatisfaction andperformance. As expected, people reported more total control or influence, less hierarchization of influence, and more task satisfaction, as a consequence of the greaterPDM, in the democratic than in the autocratic condition. Cooperative-compared with competitive-intergroup relations produced higher task satisfaction and better task performance. As expected, intergroup competition resulted in more mutual hostility and rivalry than cooperative relations, particularly in democratic groups in which the members had more opportunities to interact with each other than in autocratic groups. Group members attributed more total influence in the competitive condition, in which they had to cope with a more complex, threatening task environment than in the cooperative condition, in which they were faced with a more benign environment. All in all, it appears that intergroup competition and cooperation within organizations might be another important contingency variable that mediates the effect of PDM on task performance and satisfaction.

Small Group Research, Vol. 26, No. 2, 269-295 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/1046496495262006


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?