Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Small Group Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wagner, D. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Gender Differences in Reward Preference

A Status-Based Account

David G. Wagner

State University of New York at Albany

Extensive research has explored apparent differences in task group members'preferences for reward allocation. Some seem to prefer distributions based on equity, others a distribution based on equality. At one time, the research strongly suggested that men tended to prefer equity and women tended to prefer equality. However, in recent years that result has only been inconsistently found Using the conceptual tools of Berger, Fisek, Norman, and Wagner's reward expectation theory, an account of differences in reward preferences based on status positions in the group is developed and tested experimentally. Basically, the reward expectation argument is that group members differentiated by status will prefer equity allocations and members equated (or never differentiated) by status will prefer equality allocations. The results strongly support the reward expectation interpretation.

Small Group Research, Vol. 26, No. 3, 353-371 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/1046496495263003


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?