Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Small Group Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Roy, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by Limayem, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Electronic Group Brainstorming

The Role of Feedback on Productivity

Marie Christine Roy

Stephane Gauvin

Moez Limayem

Universite Laval

The development of electronic brainstorming systems (EBS) forces the process of idea generation to be rethought. These systems can greatly change the interface between the individual and the group, affecting the behavior of both. This study examines how the feedback on group performance provided by the public screen can affect individual motivation and idea generation. Prior psychosocial research has shown that feedback can have positive and negative effects. In a laboratory experiment, two of these psychosocialfactors were studied: social matching and social loafing. The effectiveness of continuous display versus display at the end versus no display was compared for 230 subjects. Results show mixed evidence of social loafing and significant evidence of social matching, that is, participants use EBSfeedback to adjust their level of effort to that of the group. Thesefindings have major implications for the development of better EBS and raise important questions on the theory of EBS-supported groups.

Small Group Research, Vol. 27, No. 2, 215-247 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/1046496496272002


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics SocietyHome page
C. C. Dornburg, S. M. Stevens, S. M. L. Hendrickson, and G. S. Davidson
Improving Extreme-Scale Problem Solving: Assessing Electronic Brainstorming Effectiveness in an Industrial Setting
Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, August 1, 2009; 51(4): 519 - 527.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Small Group ResearchHome page
N. C. Romano Jr., P. B. Lowry, and T. L. Roberts
Technology-Supported Small Group Interaction: Extending a Tradition of Leading Research for Virtual Teams and Global Organizations
Small Group Research, February 1, 2007; 38(1): 3 - 11.
[PDF]


Home page
Advances in Developing Human ResourcesHome page
N. Madjar
The Contributions of Different Groups of Individuals to Employees' Creativity
Advances in Developing Human Resources, May 1, 2005; 7(2): 182 - 206.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Communication ResearchHome page
S. A. Rains
Leveling the Organizational Playing Field--Virtually: A Meta-Analysis of Experimental Research Assessing the Impact of Group Support System Use on Member Influence Behaviors
Communication Research, April 1, 2005; 32(2): 193 - 234.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Group Processes Intergroup RelationsHome page
J. Munkes and M. Diehl
Matching or Competition? Performance Comparison Processes in an Idea Generation Task
Group Processes Intergroup Relations, July 1, 2003; 6(3): 305 - 320.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Small Group ResearchHome page
T. J. Kramer, G. P. Fleming, and S. M. Mannis
Improving Face-To-Face Brainstorming Through Modeling and Facilitation
Small Group Research, October 1, 2001; 32(5): 533 - 557.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Group Processes Intergroup RelationsHome page
R. Ziegler, M. Diehl, and G. Zijlstra
Idea Production in Nominal and Virtual Groups: Does Computer-Mediated Communication Improve Group Brainstorming?
Group Processes Intergroup Relations, April 1, 2000; 3(2): 141 - 158.
[Abstract] [PDF]