|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Effects of Partially Shared Information and Awareness of Unshared Information on Information Sampling
Mark Schittekatte
Alain Van Hiel
University of Ghent
The present study examines the effects of two conditions on the information flow during unstructured discussion in small groups. The experimental work of Stasser and colleagues on information sampling was our starting point. The results of their research suggest that groups often fail in effective information exchange. An experiment with a 2 x 2 factorial design was set up to look for conditions that could facilitate the exchange of unshared information. Video-recorded group discussions were analyzed on the mentioning of items during discussion. The reactions to and repetition of items were also studied. The researchers introduced partially shared information and made group members aware of the unique information that they could contribute. A significant increase in the dissemination of unshared information was found under these conditions. An empirical basis was laid so that guidelines for effective information sampling by Stasser could be reformulated.
Small Group Research, Vol. 27, No. 3,
431-449 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/1046496496273006

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Pavitt, A. C. High, K. E. Tressler, and J. K. Winslow
Leadership Communication During Group Resource Dilemmas
Small Group Research,
August 1, 2007;
38(4):
509 - 531.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. R. Larson Jr and V. M. Harmon
Recalling Shared vs. Unshared Information Mentioned During Group Discussion: Toward Understanding Differential Repetition Rates
Group Processes Intergroup Relations,
July 1, 2007;
10(3):
311 - 322.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. M. Van Swol
Perceived Importance of Information: The Effects of Mentioning Information, Shared Information Bias, Ownership Bias, Reiteration, and Confirmation Bias
Group Processes Intergroup Relations,
April 1, 2007;
10(2):
239 - 256.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. W. Phillips, G. B. Northcraft, and M. A. Neale
Surface-Level Diversity and Decision-Making in Groups: When Does Deep-Level Similarity Help?
Group Processes Intergroup Relations,
October 1, 2006;
9(4):
467 - 482.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. D. Henningsen and M. L. M. Henningsen
Examining Social Influence in Information-Sharing Contexts
Small Group Research,
August 1, 2003;
34(4):
391 - 412.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. SAVADORI, L. M. VAN SWOL, and J. A. SNIEZEK
Information Sampling and Confidence Within Groups and Judge Advisor Systems
Communication Research,
December 1, 2001;
28(6):
737 - 771.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. M. SUSSKIND
Efficacy and Outcome Expectations Related to Customer Complaints About Service Experiences
Communication Research,
June 1, 2000;
27(3):
353 - 378.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. G. CRUZ, D. D. HENNINGSEN, and B. A. SMITH
The Impact of Directive Leadership on Group Information Sampling, Decisions, and Perceptions of the Leader
Communication Research,
June 1, 1999;
26(3):
349 - 369.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. R. Larson Jr.
Modeling the Entry of Shared and Unshared information into Group Discussion: A Review and Basic Language Computer Program
Small Group Research,
August 1, 1997;
28(3):
454 - 479.
[Abstract]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. G. CRUZ, F. J. BOSTER, and J. I. RODRIGUEZ
The Impact of Group Size and Proportion of Shared Information on the Exchange and Integration of Information in Groups
Communication Research,
June 1, 1997;
24(3):
291 - 313.
[Abstract]
|
 |
|
|
|