Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Small Group Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gopal, A.
Right arrow Articles by Bostrom, R. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Leveraging Diversity with Information Technology

Gender, Attitude, and Intervening Influences in the Use of Group Support Systems

Abhijit Gopal

University of Calgary

Shaila M. Miranda

Florida Atlantic University

Barry P. Robichaux

Holland & Davis, Inc.

Robert P. Bostrom

University of Georgia

The role of diversity among individuals and groups in explaining differences in the results of group support system (GSS) use is recognized in the literature as important but has not been adequately investigated. Moreover, knowledge of such effects may be of limited use if a meaningful way of using this information is not available. This article looks into the effects of one aspect of diversity-gender In a preliminary analysis of gender effects, a model incorporating gender, attitude toward GSS, and variables that moderate the relationship between them is constructed. Data from two studies are used to test the model using the partial least-squares technique. The finding thatfemales had more positive attitudes toward GSS use is examined within the framework of the model, and suggestions are presented concerning the use of this information to improve GSS design and use as well as to study other aspects of workforce diversity. Although the analysis is exploratory in nature, it serves to show that the issues of gender and diversity are worthy offurther attention and demonstrates the usefulness of a modelfor the further study of gender in the context of variables that more fully reflect its role in GSS use.

Small Group Research, Vol. 28, No. 1, 29-71 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/1046496497281002


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Small Group ResearchHome page
N. C. Romano Jr., P. B. Lowry, and T. L. Roberts
Technology-Supported Small Group Interaction: Extending a Tradition of Leading Research for Virtual Teams and Global Organizations
Small Group Research, February 1, 2007; 38(1): 3 - 11.
[PDF]


Home page
Management Communication QuarterlyHome page
C. R. Scott and S. A. Rains
Anonymous Communication in Organizations: Assessing Use and Appropriateness
Management Communication Quarterly, November 1, 2005; 19(2): 157 - 197.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Communication ResearchHome page
A. J. Flanagin, V. Tiyaamornwong, J. O'Connor, and D. R. Seibold
Computer-Mediated Group Work: The Interaction of Sex and Anonymity
Communication Research, February 1, 2002; 29(1): 66 - 93.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Leadership and Organizational StudiesHome page
E. E. Klein
The Impact of Information Technology on Leadership Opportunities for Women: The Leveling of the Playing Field
Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, January 1, 2000; 7(3): 88 - 98.
[Abstract] [PDF]