Small Group Research

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Free Access - Register Here

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wekselberg, V.
Right arrow Articles by Collings, T. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Small Group Research, Vol. 28, No. 1, 3-28 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/1046496497281001

A Multifaceted Concept of Group Maturity and Its Measurement and Relationship to Group Performance

Victor Wekselberg

William C. Goggin

Tonya J. Collings

University of Southern Mississippi

The purpose of this study was to investigate two psychological group characteristics as indicators of the level of group development. These two characteristics, congruence of group goals and individual goals and congruence of attitudes, were studied in their relationship to performance and group cohesion. Participants were 53 firefighters in a small city in the Southeastern United States who were members of 20 groups of 2 to 4 members each. The hypothesis that linked agreement on group goals with congruence of attitudes was supported. Agreement on group goals was found to be a necessary but not a sufficient condition for a high congruence between group goals and individual goals. There was also supportfor two of three hypotheses about the relationships between various indicators of group maturity and group performance. The study suggested that instead of trying to salvage the concept of cohesion, we should abandon it. In its place, we should construct more than one conceptually clear variable that describes social groups. Furthermore, the overall level of group maturity can only be useful if we know which specific variables contributed to it.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Small Group ResearchHome page
D. F. Crown
Effects of Structurally Competitive Multilevel Goals for an Interdependent Task
Small Group Research, April 1, 2007; 38(2): 265 - 288.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Small Group ResearchHome page
A. P. Hare
Roles, Relationships, And Groups In Organizations: Some Conclusions And Recommendations
Small Group Research, April 1, 2003; 34(2): 123 - 154.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Small Group ResearchHome page
A. Chang and P. Bordia
A Multidimensional Approach to the Group Cohesion-Group Performance Relationship
Small Group Research, August 1, 2001; 32(4): 379 - 405.
[Abstract] [PDF]