Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Small Group Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Larson, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Modeling the Entry of Shared and Unshared information into Group Discussion

A Review and Basic Language Computer Program

James R. Larson, Jr.

University of Illinois at Chicago

Prior to discussion, members of decision-making groups often possess a certain amount of decision-relevant information that others in the group do not hold. This is referred to as unshared information and stands in contrast to the shared information that all group members possess. One objective of group discussion is to enable members to exchange their unshared information. Research suggests, however, that groups often discuss more oftheirshared than their unshared information overall, and that they discuss their shared information first. A dynamic information sampling model that predicts these results is reviewed. Several empirical tests of this model are summarized, and a computer program that operationalizes the model is described. The computer program provides an efficient means of generating specific predictions for empirical studies andfor exploring the expected impact on group discussion of varying the model's input parameters.

Small Group Research, Vol. 28, No. 3, 454-479 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/1046496497283007


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Group Processes Intergroup RelationsHome page
J. R. Larson Jr and V. M. Harmon
Recalling Shared vs. Unshared Information Mentioned During Group Discussion: Toward Understanding Differential Repetition Rates
Group Processes Intergroup Relations, July 1, 2007; 10(3): 311 - 322.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Small Group ResearchHome page
J. A. Bonito and B. L. Lambert
Information Similarity as a Moderator of the Effect of Gender on Participation in Small Groups: A Multilevel Analysis
Small Group Research, April 1, 2005; 36(2): 139 - 165.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Communication ResearchHome page
J. A. Bonito
Shared Cognition and Participation in Small Groups: Similarity of Member Prototypes
Communication Research, December 1, 2004; 31(6): 704 - 730.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Small Group ResearchHome page
J. A. Bonito
The Analysis of Participation in Small Groups: Methodological and Conceptual Issues Related to Interdependence
Small Group Research, August 1, 2002; 33(4): 412 - 438.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Communication ResearchHome page
J. A. BONITO
An Information-Processing Approach to Participation in Small Groups
Communication Research, June 1, 2001; 28(3): 275 - 303.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
J. R. Larson Jr., P. G. Foster-Fishman, and T. M. Franz
Leadership Style and the Discussion of Shared and Unshared Information in Decision-Making Groups
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, May 1, 1998; 24(5): 482 - 495.
[Abstract]