Small Group Research

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Free Access - Register Here

Click here for free access to the SAGE eReference platform!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Craig, K. M.
Right arrow Articles by Rand, K. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Small Group Research, Vol. 29, No. 3, 339-358 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/1046496498293003

The Perceptually "Privileged" Group Member

Consequences of Solo Status for African Americans and Whites in Task Groups

Kellina M. Craig

California State University, Long Beach

Kristine A. Rand

Amoco Corporation, Chicago, Illinois

The effect of solo status was investigated in 32 same-sex small groups in which the racial status of one of the four members was systematically varied to reflect African American and White group majorities. During one task-oriented session, each group member made ratings of one another and selected one member to be leader on a future task. Judgments of solos varied as a function of their racial status. African American solos were judged more favorably and were more often selected to be leader than were White targets in both African American and White majorities. More generally, these findings indicate that theories of relative numbers and salience effects that explain group processes in gender contexts do not apply in the same way to race contexts. Implications of these findings for organizational settings, and interracial interaction in small groups are discussed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
J. B. White
Fail or Flourish? Cognitive Appraisal Moderates the Effect of Solo Status on Performance
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, September 1, 2008; 34(9): 1171 - 1184.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Black StudiesHome page
C. M. Motley and K. M. Craig-Henderson
Epithet or Endearment? Examining Reactions Among Those of the African Diaspora to an Ethnic Epithet
Journal of Black Studies, July 1, 2007; 37(6): 944 - 963.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Leadership and Organizational StudiesHome page
J. L. Knight, M. R. Hebl, J. B. Foster, and L. M. Mannix
Out of Role? Out of Luck: The Influence of Race and Leadership Status on Performance Appraisals
Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, January 1, 2003; 9(3): 85 - 93.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Black PsychologyHome page
S. D. Jefferson and R. Caldwell
An Exploration of the Relationship between Racial Identity Attitudes and the Perception of Racial Bias
Journal of Black Psychology, May 1, 2002; 28(2): 174 - 192.
[Abstract] [PDF]