Small Group Research

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Waung, M.
Right arrow Articles by Brice, T. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Small Group Research, Vol. 29, No. 5, 624-634 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/1046496498295005

The Effects of Conscientiousness and Opportunity to Caucus on Group Performance

Marie Waung

University of Michigan-Dearbom

Thomas S. Brice

The Polk Company

Given the increasing use of work teams in organizations, personnel selection procedures based on individual conscientiousness are likely to result in groups composed of highly conscientious members. This laboratory experiment examined the performance of groups of either high or low conscientious individuals, with the groups being given more (caucus condition) or less (no caucus condition) opportunity to develop performance norms. Groups of high-conscientious individuals given the chance to caucus were less productive than such groups that were not given the opportunity to caucus and less productive than groups of low-conscientious individuals given the chance to caucus. Thesefindings are explained in terms of the development of quality norms by the high-conscientious caucus groups at the expense of productivity.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of ManagementHome page
Z. Lin, H. Yang, B. Arya, Z. Huang, and D. Li
Structural Versus Individual Perspectives on the Dynamics of Group Performance: Theoretical Exploration and Empirical Investigation
Journal of Management, June 1, 2005; 31(3): 354 - 380.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Small Group ResearchHome page
T. Halfhill, E. Sundstrom, J. Lahner, W. Calderone, and T. M. Nielsen
Group Personality Composition and Group Effectiveness: An Integrative Review of Empirical Research
Small Group Research, February 1, 2005; 36(1): 83 - 105.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Small Group ResearchHome page
A. English, R. L. Griffith, and L. A. Steelman
Team Performance: The Effect of Team Conscientiousness and Task Type
Small Group Research, December 1, 2004; 35(6): 643 - 665.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Small Group ResearchHome page
S. Mohammed and L. C. Angell
Personality Heterogeneity in Teams: Which Differences Make a Difference for Team Performance?
Small Group Research, December 1, 2003; 34(6): 651 - 677.
[Abstract] [PDF]