Small Group Research

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Henry, K. B.
Right arrow Articles by Carini, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Small Group Research, Vol. 30, No. 5, 558-581 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/104649649903000504
© 1999 SAGE Publications

A Tripartite Model of Group Identification

Theory and Measurement

Kelly Bouas Henry

University of Oklahoma, henry{at}griffon.mwsc.edu

Holly Arrow

University of Oregon, harrow{at}darkwing.uoregon.edu

Barbara Carini

University of Oregon

Group identification is defined as member identification with an interacting group and is distinguished conceptually from social identity, cohesion, and common fate. Group identification is proposed to have three sources: cognitive (social categorization), affective (interpersonal attraction), and behavioral (interdependence). Inconsistent use of the term and problematic measurement mar existing literature on group identity and group identification. A new group identification scale, composed of three subscales that match the tripartite model for the cognitive, affective, and behavioral sources, is presented and its psychometric properties described.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Group Processes Intergroup RelationsHome page
R. Holtz and T. H. Nihiser
Relative Deprivation, Attitude Contrast Projection, and Opinion Certainty
Group Processes Intergroup Relations, January 1, 2008; 11(1): 89 - 114.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Small Group ResearchHome page
M. J. Hornsey, L. Dwyer, and T. P. S. Oei
Beyond Cohesiveness: Reconceptualizing the Link Between Group Processes and Outcomes in Group Psychotherapy
Small Group Research, October 1, 2007; 38(5): 567 - 592.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Applied Behavioral ScienceHome page
H. E. Peelle III
Appreciative Inquiry and Creative Problem Solving in Cross-Functional Teams
Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, December 1, 2006; 42(4): 447 - 467.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Small Group ResearchHome page
C. M. Mason
Exploring the Processes Underlying Within-Group Homogeneity
Small Group Research, June 1, 2006; 37(3): 233 - 270.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
J. Duckitt, J. Callaghan, and C. Wagner
Group Identification and Outgroup Attitudes in Four South African Ethnic Groups: A Multidimensional Approach
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, May 1, 2005; 31(5): 633 - 646.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Small Group ResearchHome page
Ij. H. Van Emmerik, M. Lambooy, and K. Sanders
Differential Effects of Individual-Linked and Team-Level Status Allocation on Professionals' Job Performance
Small Group Research, December 1, 2002; 33(6): 702 - 717.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Communication ResearchHome page
L. SAVADORI, L. M. VAN SWOL, and J. A. SNIEZEK
Information Sampling and Confidence Within Groups and Judge Advisor Systems
Communication Research, December 1, 2001; 28(6): 737 - 771.
[Abstract] [PDF]