Small Group Research

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Armstrong, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Priola, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Small Group Research, Vol. 32, No. 3, 283-312 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/104649640103200302
© 2001 SAGE Publications

Individual Differences in Cognitive Style and their Effects on Task and Social Orientations of Self-Managed Work Teams

Steven J. Armstrong

University of Hull, s.j.armstrong{at}hubs.hull.ac.uk

Vincenza Priola

University of Wolverhampton

When assembling self-managing work teams, the personalities of team members are often overlooked. One personality variable known to be critical for effective decision making in teams is cognitive style. This study sought to examine how differences and similarities in analytic/intuitive cognitive styles affected the behavior of team members on the task/emotionally expressive dimension identified by Bales. As hypothesized, intuitive individuals and homogeneous intuitive teams were found to initiate more social-emotional acts. Contrary to expectations, intuitive rather than analytic individuals and homogeneous intuitive rather than analytic teams engaged in more task-oriented behaviors. Teams also tended to select intuitive individuals as leaders. The possibility that different combinations of styles may be important for overall team effectiveness was subsequently discussed, and it was suggested that this may depend on whether the nature of the work environment is relatively well structured and mechanistic or relatively unstructured and organic.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Small Group ResearchHome page
A.-F. Rutkowski, C. Saunders, D. Vogel, and M. van Genuchten
"Is It Already 4 a.m. in Your Time Zone?": Focus Immersion and Temporal Dissociation in Virtual Teams
Small Group Research, February 1, 2007; 38(1): 98 - 129.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Small Group ResearchHome page
V. Priola, J. L. Smith, and S. J. Armstrong
Group Work and Cognitive Style: A Discursive Investigation
Small Group Research, October 1, 2004; 35(5): 565 - 595.
[Abstract] [PDF]