Small Group Research

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hogg, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Hinkle, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Small Group Research, Vol. 35, No. 3, 246-276 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/1046496404263424
© 2004 SAGE Publications

The Social Identity Perspective

Intergroup Relations, Self-Conception, and Small Groups

Michael A. Hogg

University of Queensland, Australia

Dominic Abrams

University of Kent, England

Sabine Otten

University of Groningen, the Netherlands

Steve Hinkle

University of Miami, USA

The historical development, metatheoretical background, and current state of the social identity perspective in social psychology are described. Although originally an analysis mainly of intergroup relations between large-scale social categories, and more recently an analysis with a strong social cognitive emphasis, this article shows that the social identity perspective is intended to be a general analysis of group membership and group processes. It focuses on the generative relationship between collective self-conception and group phenomena. To demonstrate the relevance of the social identity perspective to small groups, the article describes social identity research in a number of areas: differentiation within groups; leadership; deviance; group decision making; organizations; computermediated communication; mobilization, collective action, and social loafing; and group culture. These are the areas in which most work has been done and which are therefore best placed for further developments in the near future.

Key Words: social identity • intergroup behavior • group processes • social categorization


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
S. Roccas, L. Sagiv, S. Schwartz, N. Halevy, and R. Eidelson
Toward a Unifying Model of Identification With Groups: Integrating Theoretical Perspectives
Personality and Social Psychology Review, August 1, 2008; 12(3): 280 - 306.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Small Group ResearchHome page
F. Buton, P. Fontayne, J.-P. Heuze, G. Bosselut, and N. Raimbault
The QAG-a: An Analog Version of the Questionnaire sur l'Ambiance du Groupe for Measuring the Dynamic Nature of Group Cohesion
Small Group Research, April 1, 2007; 38(2): 235 - 264.
[Abstract] [PDF]