This Article Abstract Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Krebs, S. A. Articles by Bordia, P. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Virtual Teams and Group Member Dissimilarity

Consequences for the Development of Trust

Elizabeth V. Hobman

University of Queensland

Prashant Bordia

University of South Australia

The consequences of demographic dissimilarity for group trust in work teams was examined in a virtual (computer-mediated) and a face-to-face (FTF) environment. Demographic dissimilarity (based on age, gender, country of birth, enrolled degree) was predicted to be negatively associated with group trust in the FTF environment but not in the computer-mediated environment. Participants worked in small groups on a creative task for 3 consecutive days. In the computer-mediated environment, participants worked on the task for an hour per day. In the FTF environment, participants worked on the task for 20 minutes per day. Partial support was found for the effectiveness of computer-mediated groups in reducing the negative consequences of dissimilarity. Age dissimilarity was negatively related to trust in FTF groups but not in computer-mediated groups. Birthplace dissimilarity was positively related to trust in computer-mediated groups. Implications for the successful management of virtual teams are discussed.

Key Words: diversity • virtual teams • computer-mediated communication • trust

References

• Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. London: Sage.
• Bhappu, A. D., Meader, D. K., Erwin, C. R., & Crews, J. M. (2000, August). For better or worse? Demographic diversity and computer-mediated communication in decision-making teams. Paper presented at the 60th annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Toronto, Canada.
• Bond, M. H., & Wang, S. H. (1983). Aggressive behavior in Chinese society: The problem of maintaining order and harmony. In A. P. Goldstein & M. Segall (Eds.), Global perspectives on aggression (pp. 58-74). New York: Pergamon.
• Bontempo, R., Lobel, S. A., & Triandis, H. C. (1990). Compliance and value internalization in Brazil and the U.S.: Effects of allocentrism and anonymity. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 21, 200-213.[Abstract]
• Bordia, P. (1997). Face-to-face versus computer-mediated communication: A synthesis of the experimental literature. Journal of Business Communication, 34, 99-120.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Brewer, M. (1979). In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 307-324.[CrossRef][ISI]
• Chang, A., Irmer, B., Bordia, P., & Hobman, E. (2004). How much more time is needed? The development of social and task cohesion in computer-mediated and face-to-face task groups. Manuscript submitted for publication.
• Chattopadhyay, P. (1999). Beyond direct and symmetrical effects: The influence of demographic dissimilarity on organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 273-287.
• Chidambaram, L. (1996). Relational development in computer-supported groups. MIS Quarterly, 20(2), 143-165.
• Dubrivsky, V. J., Kiesler, S., & Sethna, B. N. (1991). The equalization phenomenon: Status effects in computer-mediated and face-to-face decision-making groups. Human Computer Interaction, 6, 119-146.
• Gabarro, L. (1978). The development of trust: Influence and expectations. In A. G. Athos & J. J. Gabarro (Eds.), Interpersonal behavior: Communication and understanding relationships (pp. 290-303). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
• Handy, C. (1995). Trust and the virtual organization. Harvard Business Review, 73(3), 40-49.[ISI]
• Harrison, D. A., Price, K. H., Gavin, J. H., & Florey, A. T. (2002). Time, teams, and task performance: Changing effects of surface-and deep-level diversity on group functioning. Academy of Management Journal, 45(5), 1029-1045.[ISI]
• Hartel, C. E., & Fujimoto, Y. (1999). Explaining why diversity sometimes has positive effects in organizations and sometimes has negative effects in organizations: The perceived dissimilarity openness moderator model. In L. N. Dosier & J. B. Keys (Eds.), Academy of Management best papers proceedings[CD-ROM]. Pleasantville, NY: Academy of Management.
• Hobman, E. V., Bordia, P., & Gallois, C. (2003). Consequences of feeling dissimilar from others in a work team. Journal of Business and Psychology, 17, 301-325.[CrossRef]
• Hobman, E. V., Bordia, P., & Gallois, C. (2004). Perceived dissimilarity and work group involvement: The moderating effects of group openness to diversity. Group & Organization Management, 29, 560-587.[Abstract]
• Hobman, E. V., Bordia, P., Irmer, B., & Chang, A. (2002). The expression of conflict in computer-mediated and face-to-face groups. Small Group Research, 33, 439-465.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Hofstede, G. (1997). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. New York: McGraw-Hill.
• Irmer, B., Chang, A., & Bordia, P. (2000, August). The development of social and task cohesion in face-to-face and computer-mediated communication task groups. Best Paper Proceedings, Academy of Management Annual Conference, Toronto, Canada.
• Jarvenpaa, S. L., Knoll, K., & Leidner, D. (1998). Is anybody out there? Antecedents of trust in global virtual teams. Journal of Management Information Systems, 14(4), 29-64.
• Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Leidner, D. (1999). Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Organization Science, 10, 791-815.[CrossRef]
• Jehn, K. A., Chadwick, C., & Thatcher, S. (1997). To agree or not to agree: Diversity, conflict, and group outcomes. International Journal of Conflict Management, 8, 287-306.[CrossRef][ISI]
• Jehn, K. A., Northcraft, G. B., & Neale, M. A. (1999). Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(4), 741-763.[CrossRef][ISI]
• Jones, T. W., & Bowie, N. E. (1998). Moral hazards on the road to the "virtual" corporation. Business Ethics Quarterly, 8, 273-292.
• Kayworth, T., & Leidner, D. (2000). The global virtual manager: A prescription for success. European Management Journal, 18, 183-194.[CrossRef]
• Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20, 709-734.[CrossRef][ISI]
• McAllister, D. J. (1995). Affect-and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 24-59.[CrossRef][ISI]
• McGrath, J. E., Arrow, H., Gruenfeld, D. H., Hollingshead, A. B., & O'Connor, K. M. (1993). Group tasks and technology: The effect of experience and change. Small Group Research, 24, 406-420.[Abstract]
• Meyerson, D., Weick, K. E., & Kramer, R. M. (1996). Swift trust and temporary groups. In R. M. Kramer & T. R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research(pp. 166-195). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Nohria, N., & Eccles, R. G. (1992). Face-to-face: Making network organizations work. In N. Nohria & R. G. Eccles (Eds.), Networks and organizations: Structure, form, and action(pp. 228-308). Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
• Oetzel, J. G. (1998). Explaining individual communication processes in homogeneous and heterogeneous groups through individualism-collectivism and self-construal. Human Communication Research, 25, 202-224.[CrossRef][ISI]
• O'Hara-Devereaux, M., & Johansen, B. (1994). Global work: Bridging distance, culture, and time. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioural research: A critical review of the literature and recommended strategies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879-903.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Popovich, P. M., Hyde, K. R., Zakarajesk, T., & Blumer, C. (1987). The development of the attitudes toward computer usage scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 47, 261-298.[Abstract]
• Porter, T. W., & Lilly, B. S. (1996). The effects of conflict, trust, and task commitment on project team performance. The International Journal of Conflict Management, 7, 361-376.
• Rousseau, D., & Parks, J. M. (1993). The contracts of individuals and organizations. In B. Staw & L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 15, pp. 1-43). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
• Thomas, D. C. (1999). Cultural diversity and work group effectiveness. An experimental study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 30, 242-263.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Tsui, A., Egan, T., & O'Reilly, C. (1992). Being different: Relational demography and organizational attachment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 549-579.[CrossRef][ISI]
• Turner, J. C. (1982). Toward a cognitive definition of the group. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Social identity and intergroup relations (pp. 15-40). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
• Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorisation theory. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
• Walther, J. B. (1992). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated communication: A relational perspective. Communication Research, 19, 52-90.[Abstract]
• Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23, 3-43.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Williams, K. Y., & O'Reilly, C. A. (1998). Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. Research in Organizational Behavior, 20, 77-140.
• Williams, M. (2001). In whom we trust: Group membership as an affective context for trust development. Academy of Management Review, 26, 377-396.[CrossRef]
• Zenger, T. R., & Lawrence, B. S. (1989). Organizational demography: The differential effects of age and tenure distributions on technical communication. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 353-376.[CrossRef][ISI]

CiteULike

Connotea

Del.icio.us

Digg

Reddit

Technorati

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. K. Horwitz and I. B. Horwitz The Effects of Team Diversity on Team Outcomes: A Meta-Analytic Review of Team Demography Journal of Management, December 1, 2007; 33(6): 987 - 1015. [Abstract] [PDF]

				N. C. Romano Jr., P. B. Lowry, and T. L. Roberts Technology-Supported Small Group Interaction: Extending a Tradition of Leading Research for Virtual Teams and Global Organizations Small Group Research, February 1, 2007; 38(1): 3 - 11. [PDF]

This Article Abstract Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Krebs, S. A. Articles by Bordia, P. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?