Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Small Group Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
1046496408320418v1
39/5/616    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Halfhill, T. R.
Right arrow Articles by Sundstrom, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Article

The ASA Framework: A Field Study of Group Personality Composition and Group Performance in Military Action Teams

Terry R. Halfhill1*, Tjai M. Nielsen2, and Eric Sundstrom3

1 Pennsylvania State University
2 The George Washington University
3 University of Tennessee-Knoxville

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: trh12{at}psu.edu.


  Abstract
A theoretical model integrating Schneider’s Attraction-Selection-Attrition (ASA) framework, group personality composition, and group performance is presented. The proposed model focuses on three operationalizations of group composition based on the Big Five personality traits. This model suggests that for certain types of teams group minimum scores vary more than group mean scores, resulting in more robust predictors of group effectiveness. Results indicate that group minimum Agreeableness and Conscientiousness correlate positively with supervisor ratings of performance, group average scores correlate positively with performance, and variance of Conscientiousness correlate inversely with group performance. Minimum scores for both Agreeableness and Conscientiousness vary more than mean scores, and teams with increased levels of both Agreeableness and Conscientiousness receive higher performance ratings than other types of teams. Initial support for the proposed model is presented, practical and research implications are discussed, and future directions for research are suggested.

First published on July 22, 2008, doi:10.1177/1046496408320418

Small Group Research 2008;39:616.

A more recent version of this article appeared on October 1, 2008

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?