Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Small Group Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Straus, S. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Getting a Clue

The Effects of Communication Media and Information Distribution on Participation and Performance in Computer-Mediated and Face-to-Face Groups

Susan G. Straus

Carnegie Mellon Unhiversity

Computer-mediated communication (CMC) has been viewed as overcoming process losses in groups by fostering equal particpation in discussions. This study examines antecedents of participation and tests the hypothesis that the benefit of the equalization effect depends on how information is distributed within the group. Fifty-four 3-person groups worked on a problem-solving task either in computer conferences or inface-to-face meetings. Additional pieces of information (clues) were distributed equally across members orto single members. In contrast to ideas that electronic communication reduces inhibitions, participation in CMC was associated with individual differences in extraversion. In addition; despite more equal participation in CMC, individuals dondated in both media. Media had few effects on information sharing or performance, although CMC groups were less satisfied with the process. Results of this and other studies of group problem solving suggest that patterms of interaction andperformance in computer-mediated groups do not depart substantiallyfrom face-to-face groups, although CMC may introduce new process losses.

Small Group Research, Vol. 27, No. 1, 115-142 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/1046496496271006


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Leadership and Organizational StudiesHome page
D. G. Kolb, G. Prussia, and J. Francoeur
Connectivity and Leadership: The Influence of Online Activity on Closeness and Effectiveness
Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, May 1, 2009; 15(4): 342 - 352.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Communication ResearchHome page
S. S. Ho and D. M. McLeod
Social-Psychological Influences on Opinion Expression in Face-to-Face and Computer-Mediated Communication
Communication Research, April 1, 2008; 35(2): 190 - 207.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Small Group ResearchHome page
S.-C. S. Li
Computer-Mediated Communication and Group Decision Making: A Functional Perspective
Small Group Research, October 1, 2007; 38(5): 593 - 614.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Small Group ResearchHome page
N. C. Romano Jr., P. B. Lowry, and T. L. Roberts
Technology-Supported Small Group Interaction: Extending a Tradition of Leading Research for Virtual Teams and Global Organizations
Small Group Research, February 1, 2007; 38(1): 3 - 11.
[PDF]


Home page
Small Group ResearchHome page
A.-F. Rutkowski, C. Saunders, D. Vogel, and M. van Genuchten
"Is It Already 4 a.m. in Your Time Zone?": Focus Immersion and Temporal Dissociation in Virtual Teams
Small Group Research, February 1, 2007; 38(1): 98 - 129.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Small Group ResearchHome page
R. J. Mejias
The Interaction of Process Losses, Process Gains, and Meeting Satisfaction Within Technology-Supported Environments
Small Group Research, February 1, 2007; 38(1): 156 - 194.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Management EducationHome page
D. N. Clark and J. L. Gibb
Virtual Team Learning: An Introductory Study Team Exercise
Journal of Management Education, December 1, 2006; 30(6): 765 - 787.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Management EducationHome page
R. B. Marks, S. D. Sibley, and J. B. Arbaugh
A Structural Equation Model of Predictors for Effective Online Learning
Journal of Management Education, August 1, 2005; 29(4): 531 - 563.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Small Group ResearchHome page
S. J. Adams, S. G. Roch, and R. Ayman
Communication Medium and Member Familiarity: The Effects on Decision Time, Accuracy, and Satisfaction
Small Group Research, June 1, 2005; 36(3): 321 - 353.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of ManagementHome page
L. L. Martins, L. L. Gilson, and M. T. Maynard
Virtual Teams: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go From Here?
Journal of Management, December 1, 2004; 30(6): 805 - 835.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Management EducationHome page
J. A. Parnell and S. Carraher
The Management Education by Internet Readiness (Mebir) Scale: Developing a Scale to Assess Personal Readiness for Internet-Mediated Management Education
Journal of Management Education, August 1, 2003; 27(4): 431 - 446.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Communication ResearchHome page
C. Cornelius and M. Boos
Enhancing Mutual Understanding in Synchronous Computer-Mediated Communication by Training: Trade-Offs in Judgmental Tasks
Communication Research, April 1, 2003; 30(2): 147 - 177.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management LearningHome page
J. B. Arbaugh and R. Duray
Technological and Structural Characteristics, Student Learning and Satisfaction with Web-Based Courses: An Exploratory Study of Two On-Line MBA Programs
Management Learning, September 1, 2002; 33(3): 331 - 347.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
T. Postmes and R. Spears
Behavior Online: Does Anonymous Computer Communication Reduce Gender Inequality?
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, August 1, 2002; 28(8): 1073 - 1083.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Social Science Computer ReviewHome page
S. J. Schneider, J. Kerwin, J. Frechtling, and B. A. Vivari
Characteristics of the Discussion in Online and Face-to-Face Focus Groups
Social Science Computer Review, February 1, 2002; 20(1): 31 - 42.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Small Group ResearchHome page
B. Whitworth, B. Gallupe, and R. Mcqueen
Generating Agreement in Computer-Mediated Groups
Small Group Research, October 1, 2001; 32(5): 625 - 665.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Small Group ResearchHome page
H. Barki and A. Pinsonneault
Small Group Brainstorming and Idea Quality: Is Electronic Brainstorming the Most Effective Approach?
Small Group Research, April 1, 2001; 32(2): 158 - 205.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management LearningHome page
J. B. Arbaugh
An Exploratory Study of the Effects of Gender on Student Learning and Class Participation in an Internet-Based MBA Course
Management Learning, December 1, 2000; 31(4): 503 - 519.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Management EducationHome page
J. B. Arbaugh
Virtual Classroom versus Physical Classroom: An Exploratory Study of Class Discussion Patterns and Student Learning in an Asynchronous Internet-Based MBA Course
Journal of Management Education, April 1, 2000; 24(2): 213 - 233.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Management EducationHome page
J. B. Arbaugh
Virtual Classroom Characteristics and Student Satisfaction with Internet-Based MBA Courses
Journal of Management Education, February 1, 2000; 24(1): 32 - 54.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Business Communication QuarterlyHome page
J.B. Arbaugh
How Classroom Environment and Student Engagement Affect Learning in Internet-based MBA Courses
Business Communication Quarterly, January 1, 2000; 63(4): 9 - 26.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Communication ResearchHome page
T. POSTMES, R. SPEARS, and M. LEA
Breaching or Building Social Boundaries?: SIDE-Effects of Computer-Mediated Communication
Communication Research, December 1, 1998; 25(6): 689 - 715.
[Abstract]


Home page
Small Group ResearchHome page
K. A. Graetz, E. S. Boyle, C. E. Kimble, P. Thompson, and J. L. Garloch
Information Sharing in Face-to-Face, Teleconferencing, and Electronic Chat Groups
Small Group Research, December 1, 1998; 29(6): 714 - 743.
[Abstract]


Home page
Social Science Computer ReviewHome page
T. A. Finholt and S. D. Teasley
Psychology: The Need for Psychology in Research on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work
Social Science Computer Review, April 1, 1998; 16(1): 40 - 52.
[Abstract] [PDF]